The Book Mine Set

Online book discussion forum.

My Photo
Name: John Mutford
Location: Iqaluit, Nunavut, Canada

I am happily married with two kids, I love reading, I love discussing books, and I will always struggle to become a better writer. I've moved a lot in recent years, but the desire to settle permanently is sinking in. My traveling can be done through books.

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

The Great Wednesday Compare 2: Margaret Laurence VERSUS Alice Munro

The winner of last week's Great Wednesday Compare (Charlotte Brontë Vs. Margaret Laurence), with a final score of 9-6, was Margaret Laurence.

As I suspected, the voting for last week seemed to be based primarily on which side of the border one lived. There were some exceptions of course, and as Ripley said, it wasn't all homegrown pride that was coming into play. Most non-Canadians seem not to have any familiarity with Laurence while everyone has at least heard of the Brontës. I'm still deciding which Brontë I'll start with.

I hope having another Canadian contestant this week doesn't completely alienate my other readers, but I couldn't resist this one. For such a long time now, I've considered Atwood, Laurence, Shields and Munro the four queens of CanLit-- based more on popularity and their prolific careers than anything personal. Atwood, Shields and Laurence have all had their turns at the Wednesday Compares, I figured I might as well round out the lot.

Remember, vote simply by adding your comment below, base it on whatever merit you choose, voting does not end until Tuesday at 11:59 p.m. (May 27, 2008), and please spread the word!

Who's better?













And for an additional bit of fun, assuming Margaret Atwood, Margaret Laurence, Carol Shields, and Alice Munro are the four queens of CanLit, what would their respective roles be in a deck of cards? Would one of the Margarets be the Queen of Hearts? Who would be the Queen of Spades? I'd love to hear your casting call and why!

Labels: , ,

Blogger Remi said...

Not fair. Not fair at all. One of my favourite novelists vs. one of my favourite short story writers. Argh.

I'll tip my hat to Piper Gunn - whose surname I share - and vote for Laurence again.

Wednesday, 21 May, 2008  
Blogger Remi said...

Oops. Forgot about the suit thing. Gut reaction has Laurence for hearts, Atwood for Spades and a toss-up for the other two. Let's go clubs for Shields and Diamonds for Munro.

Wednesday, 21 May, 2008  
Anonymous pooker said...

You stinker! I'm with remi. Not fair. How could I possibly choose between one of my favourite novelists and my favourite short story writer?

While I ponder that, I'll assign the queens their suits. That's actually quite easy.

Queen of Spades: Margaret Atwood, dark and can be a little bit b*tchy.

Queen of Diamonds: Carol Shields,financially disciplined I suspect and in person was sometimes a bit of a snob.

Queen of Clubs: Margaret Laurence, down to earth, hard working, was born and raised in Neepawa (farm country)and her Manawaka women were similarly earthy beings.

Queen of Hearts: Alice Munro, her early "coming of age" stories and novel tugged at my heart strings. Always comes across herself as a caring nurturing person.

Who's better? I'm giving the nod to Alice Munro. I've never read anything by her that I did not like and I've always recognized her voice in her writing. This was hard because I so loved Laurence's Manawaka books, but I did not care as much for her "African" novel, This Side Jordan.

Wednesday, 21 May, 2008  
Anonymous snackywombat said...

once again, i haven't read any laurence but i added her to my TBR list after last week. however, i love love love munro and would probably vote for her over anyone else anyway. i'm a short story diehard!

Wednesday, 21 May, 2008  
Blogger Jen said...

hmm, I think I'm going with Munro this time around.

I agree with Remi's suit selection too.

Wednesday, 21 May, 2008  
Anonymous Ripley said...

I'll echo the cries of "not fair". :)

I love Laurence but Munro is practically my neighbour and I know her world. So my vote goes to Alice Munro.

And I think pooker nailed the suit selection.

Wednesday, 21 May, 2008  
Blogger kookiejar said...

Oh sure, of your 'four queens' the two pitted against each other are the two I've never read. (I love the other two.)

I'm going to vote for Munro based on her ultra spunky hair do. So there.

Wednesday, 21 May, 2008  
Blogger Corey Redekop said...

Well, I've only read one of each, and as I loved Lives of Girls and Women and hated The Stone Angel, I gotta go with Laurence.

Wednesday, 21 May, 2008  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Hi Corey: I think you may have made a typo. Since Munro wrote Lives of Girls and Women and Laurence wrote Stone Angel, did you mean to vote for Munro?

Wednesday, 21 May, 2008  
Blogger Remi said...

I hated The Stone Angel back in high school. It's just not a book for teenagers. When I read it again in my mid-20's, I liked it a whole lot more. Still not my favourite, but a decent novel, nonetheless.

Wednesday, 21 May, 2008  

Monday, May 19, 2008

Reader's Diary #359- Katherine Anne Porter: The Jilting of Granny Weatherall

Short Story Monday

A couple weeks ago I posted a link to a Sporcle game that asked how many Pulitzer Prize winning books I could name. I also posted my abysmal score (10/55). Making matters worse, when you all posted your scores, it turned out I was lowest in the class! Well, if I were to take that test again today, I'd get 11.

One of those 55 books, one of the ones I missed, was a collection of short stories by Katherine Anne Porter. So, after a little bit of searching, I found one of her stories online, "The Jilting of Granny Weatherall."

Before you rush off to read it, assuming you haven't already, be forewarned that it's about death and might be a little depressing. Recently I reread a meme that I'd done a year ago which asked me to name 8 random facts about myself. My second fact was this:
I'm 30 years old and since I've been born, I've never had anyone in my family die. Not a grandparent, an uncle, aunt, cousin, no one. Might sound like a morbid thing to throw out there, but it sits in my mind more and more. I wonder if I'll deal with it okay. It will happen someday of course and it scares me a lot. It's starting to feel like we're defeating the law of averages. And I hope this doesn't jinx us all.

While I don't really believe I cursed the family, since then there have been two deaths in my family. One of my grandmothers died shortly afterwards and just two weeks ago my aunt died from leukemia. To answer the question I posed last May, I have coped fine. It hasn't helped keep death from my mind obviously, and now it's hard not to imagine my own inevitable moment and wonder how I'll cope with that.

Katherine Anne Porter's "The Jilting of Granny Weatherall" puts us in the mind of someone on her own deathbed: we are thinking our final thoughts via Granny Weatherall, an eighty year old whose lived perhaps a typical life, despite having been left at the alter years ago.

Told in a stream-of-conscious, I think I'm finally able to pinpoint what my reservations are with that style. Other stream-of-conscious works that I've read (Faulkner jumps to mind), have been more like wild rivers, ones that jump the banks and flood the whole forest floor. Realistic a representation as they might be, I find them next to impossible to follow. Porter's, fortunately, is more stream-like. It's easier to follow and I can see how one thought leads to the next. Even when Granny begins to lose her lucidity (she imagines her pillow rising and floating beneath her), Porter still controls the story and keeps it readable.

There are a lot of cliches in "The Jilting of Granny Weatherall": the cranky old woman, the patronizing doctor, even the final death scene. But, since we all die in the end, we're all cliched. While fortunately (or unfortunately for some, I guess) not many of us have been abandoned on our wedding days, that we have had pain in our life is a given. Granny tries to convince herself that things have worked out for the best, and to make peace with her life that was. Hopefully, we'll be more successful than her.

("The Jilting of Granny Weatherall" was also a made-for-t.v. movie in 1980.)

Labels: , ,

Blogger Teena said...

I just finished #13: http://purple4mee.blogspot.com/2008/05/book-red-white-and-drunk-all-over-2007.html

Whoohoo!

Monday, 19 May, 2008  
Anonymous Carrie K said...

Depressing and cliched. Sounds like an enticing read. (Yes, I cherry picked your review. It's amusing me greatly too.) It actually does sound like a good book.

Gah. Sporcle. I'm still torked that Daniel Dafoe and not Robert Louis Stevenson wrote Robinson Crusoe. Whoops.

Monday, 19 May, 2008  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Teena: Congrats on finishing. Celebrate with a glass of fine red wine!

Carrie: Cliched, but forgivably so. I'm open to reading more by her for sure.

Monday, 19 May, 2008  
Blogger Barbara Bruederlin said...

And apparently it's been adapted for tv. (All I could find on the link was the IMDB). It does sound like a worthy read.

I am sorry to hear of your aunt's passing recently. My condolescences.

Tuesday, 20 May, 2008  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Barbara: I didn't mean to add the IMDB link, it was meant to go to the story. I've fixed it above. The movie doesn't sound all that great.

Thanks for the condolensces. She'd been struggling with it for 8 or 9 years now. Obviously still sad, but not unexpected.

Tuesday, 20 May, 2008  

Sunday, May 18, 2008

Feedback Please!

What do you think or feel about this?

Labels:

Anonymous pooker said...

How do I feel? I say, phooey, I don't want to play with the new kids just 'cause their dad bought them fancy uniforms.

What do I think? Well, it does further the cause of promoting Canadian books and authors. But I think I'm still gonna get "Does not play well with others on my report." :P

Sunday, 18 May, 2008  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Pooker: While she is a Chapters employee, I'm not sure hers is a club necessarily affiliated with them. Nor do I think it's affiliated with CBC, though she's taken the name "Canada Reads" as well.

This is a bit from the latest development...

Mary Ellen Anaka writes, "I think your blog is wonderful, and I hope my members do look at the information you have on there. I have been trying to compile so info of my own, I will probably use some of your info as well as it is so informative, if you don't mind. I think the fact that we are two different people, will probably have an impact on what authors we chose and the books we end up reading. I think this could end up being very informative and alot of fun. Can't wait for the challenge to begin. Check back later to see what info I have compiled. I'm happy to have you on board as well."

To which I replied, "If you use information from my blog that isn't already public info, then I won't mind as long as I'm given credit. I think my initial reservations with your challenge was that it was identical to mine- same start and end dates with the same number of books to read. Of course there are loads of challenges out there, and it's not like I could copyright such a thing, but when you didn't originally make any reference to mine, it sort of felt like my idea was stolen. That said, you've now acknowledged mine and I'm okay with it. I won't be participating in two however since one is probably enough for me. Good luck with yours though."

Sunday, 18 May, 2008  
Blogger Remi said...

I guess you're just ahead of your time. I'll stick with your challenge.

Sunday, 18 May, 2008  
Blogger Nicola said...

I'm sticking with yours too, John!

Honestly, I think people should think up their own challenges.

Sunday, 18 May, 2008  
Blogger Teena said...

I'm with yours, John!

Sunday, 18 May, 2008  
Blogger Teena said...

BTW, I just finished #12: http://purple4mee.blogspot.com/2008/05/book-dirt-on-clean-unsanitized-history.html

Sunday, 18 May, 2008  
Blogger Barbara Bruederlin said...

Well I am glad you called her on it, John.

It would have been easy to let it slide, but you did put the challenge out a long time ago, and as you mention, the challenges are pretty much identical. It's yours, man!

Sunday, 18 May, 2008  
Blogger Teddy Rose said...

I'm sticking with you John. I geuss I'm not as nice as you, as I just left a comment for her. Go ahead and read it. It's under my real name, but I signed it with ny nick name, Teddy.

Monday, 19 May, 2008  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Thanks for the feedback! I wasn't sure if I was being hypersensitive or not.

Monday, 19 May, 2008  
Blogger raidergirl3 said...

And you posted it at indigo before she did? that's just plain weird. I don't think it was wrong to ask for some recognition; there was nothing different from yours at all. I don't think you were being sensitive. She even said she was going to copy your lists!

Monday, 19 May, 2008  
Anonymous Ripley said...

She gets zero points for creativity.

I think you handled it very well and with a remarkable amount of restraint. :)

Monday, 19 May, 2008  
Blogger Melanie said...

Cheeky. That's all I can say. It was phrased as if on her own she came up with the exact same challenge that most of us know as yours.

Monday, 19 May, 2008  
Anonymous gautami tripathy said...

John, I barey managed to finish 4 books. I can't join hers. This time let me see how many I finish!

BTW, I finally finished The Blind Assassin. It too me forever. But I am glad I finally finished it.

With Crow Lake, The Handmaid's Tale, Yellowknife, and The blind Assasin, I finished only four!

And no, I have not received your book. It will eventually turn.

Tuesday, 20 May, 2008  
Blogger Dale said...

That was disappointing to read about so I'm glad you challenged her on it as well John.

Tuesday, 20 May, 2008  

Friday, May 16, 2008

Reader's Diary #358- Paul B. Janeczko (Editor) and Chris Raschka (Illustrator): A Kick In The Head


I was about to review A Kick In The Head by Paul Janeczko and illustrated by Chris Raschka. Then I Googled it and found it's already been done for Poetry Friday many, many times. I hope it suffices to say that I loved it. Recently I lamented not buying my own copy of In Fine Form, an anthology of Canadian form poetry. A Kick In The Head, though aimed at children, will help tide me over. I hope these links to other reviews, re-written in some of the forms found in Janeczko's book, will help tide you over.

Found Poem
from Susan's comments left at Chicken Spaghetti

I did not like Janeczko's
A Kick In The Head
very much. I know. I'm one of the few.
It struck me
as a book for an adult writing group,
not a book for kids.


Epitaph
from Fusenumber 8

Here lies Fusenumber 8--
She discovered the book,
but was it really too late?

Riddle Poem
from Charlotte's Library

Enthusing about this book is fine
Since she has none of these--
Should she take you out to dinner
ask her to make some please.

Haiku
from Blog From The Windowsill

Inaccessibly
strange depictions of people--
Not quite perfection.


Acrostic
from Miss Rumphius

Has
Inspirational
Thoughts


Couplet
from Kelly Fineman

Praise for an excellent collaboration
Leads to Janeczko celebration.

You may have noticed that I picked short forms. In the book you will find longer forms like pantoums, villanelles, sonnets and more. For better poems than the ones I posted here, check out the book. You'll find classics by Shakespeare, Robert W. Service, and others, as well as more contemporary works by such poets as Joan Bransfield Graham and Gary Soto. For better reviews, check out the links above.

Labels: , ,

Blogger Sara said...

I love Janeczko and Raschka, so you didn't really have to convince me, but now I wish I'd reviewed it, so you could have cleverly transformed my words too, O Poetic Reporter.

Friday, 16 May, 2008  
Blogger Tricia said...

Your review suits me just fine! I may just have to head over to Chicken Spaghetti and find out what Susan was thinking. I love this book! (Though I'll admit I haven't used it below middle school.)

Friday, 16 May, 2008  
Blogger TadMack said...

We'd still like to hear your take on it, even though it's been done! Your overview on everyone else's take cracked me up!

Friday, 16 May, 2008  
Blogger Elaine Magliaro said...

John,

I'm with Tadmack. Different reviewers may have different opinions of a book. I think A KICK IN THE HEAD is a book that can be used by both adult and child writers. I also think it would be an excellent resource in a writing classroom.

Friday, 16 May, 2008  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Sara: Of course, you could always transform my post a la the telephone game.

Tricia: I haven't used it as a teaching aid, but I like it enough for myself not to care too much if it's not a success with kids. For what it's worth, my own children like it and they're below school age.

Tadmack: I wouldn't have much to add. I did love the illustrations; they were fun, colourful and with just the right balance of abstract and realism to match the poetry. I did question why they chose to write the poem titles below instead of on top, though.

Elaine: As I said above, I haven't used it in a classroom. Though I suspect it would make a great resource. Perhaps a grade one class may not be up to a double dactyl, but they'd easily handle the couplets and tercets, perhaps limericks and senryus too. It's a resource in which almost anyone could probably find something of use.

Friday, 16 May, 2008  
Blogger Kelly Fineman said...

I love the way you reworked the reviews into forms. You, sir, are a genius. (It's a great resource, isn't it?)

P.S. - I hope you get a copy of the Canadian book you wanted!

Friday, 16 May, 2008  
Blogger Barbara Bruederlin said...

clever clever reviewers!

Saturday, 17 May, 2008  
Blogger Charlotte said...

Oh my gosh, your capsule reviews are very clever and funny, and thanks for the link! But, she says sadly, it is perhaps too clever for me because I can't figure out the answer to the riddle poem you wrote about my review! Help?

Monday, 19 May, 2008  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Kelly: The book is still in print and quite easy to attain. It's just my cheapness that I haven't.

Barbara: That Poetry Friday crowd, eh?

Charlotte: Reservations. From the opening sentence of your post, "It's so great to enthuse about a book, with absolutely no reservations at all."

Monday, 19 May, 2008  
Anonymous Susan T. said...

John, you are very clever. Thanks for the linkage.

Monday, 19 May, 2008  

Thursday, May 15, 2008

Read The #@%&*! Instructions


As a follow-up to last week's question about writing manuals, this week's BTT Question is about manuals in general:

Scenario: You’ve just bought some complicated gadget home . . . do you read the accompanying documentation? Or not?

Do you ever read manuals?

How-to books?

Self-help guides?

Anything at all?


It'll be interesting to see if there's a correlation with participant answers from last week to this week.

For myself, I now read the supporting documentation with those complicated gadgets. Especially the ones we need to put together. After an incident with a vacuum cleaner and a runaway base that kept blowing dust up into the air while I chased it with the bag/handle, my wife decided for me that the instructions weren't "merely suggestions."

Other than that, I'm not big on the "how-to" books. I remember getting an "Idiot's Guide To Being A Groom" as a present when I first announced to my family that I was engaged. The only thing I remember from it was a suggestion to watch The Godfather to relax on the day of my wedding. I didn't do either.

Oh wait, do cookbooks count? Doesn't get more "How To" than that. I do use those on occasion.

Self-help guides? Not so much. I don't trust advice from someone that doesn't know me or my circumstances. Not to say readers can't adapt what's applicable and what's not, but they're just not for me.

And I'm not sure where travel books fit in, but I have bought a few of those over the years as well. My most recent one was a guide to family vacations. Can't wait to try some of those out.

Labels: ,

Blogger BooksPlease said...

Things that need putting together can be so tricky - there's usually something left over, although my husband says that they are spare parts.

I didn't think of cook books - I regularly use those, but adapt the recipes to suit the ingredients I have to hand.

Thursday, 15 May, 2008  
Blogger Chris said...

I thought of cookbooks too. Travel books count, I think. How not to get lost, kidnapped, that sort of thing.

Thursday, 15 May, 2008  
Blogger Melanie said...

i completely forgot about travel books. I just kinda read those anyway when i wish i could go on a trip somewhere exotic

Thursday, 15 May, 2008  
Blogger Jen said...

I like manuals. For new gadgets I usually read at least part if not all documentation. Anything that actually has to be put together - i read the manual.

I think I own a couple "idiot's guides..." to things like programming languages. And I have several cookbooks I use.

I don't read/use self-help guides though.

Thursday, 15 May, 2008  
Anonymous gautami tripathy said...

I love travel books. I can devour those anywhere anytime!

And I do read the instruction manuals. I have too. As I do not have a husband to explain it all to me!

*grin*

Thursday, 15 May, 2008  
Blogger Megan said...

I think you make an excellent point that some author of a self help book has no idea where you are in your life, but sometimes you know what you are looking for and find the book that you need. But this is the same reason why I really like workbook style self help books. They help me to push my mind into thinking about myself in new ways. And who doesn't like to think about themselves? And talk about themselves? And mention how beautiful and wonderful they are... Or, well, maybe that's just me?!?

Thursday, 15 May, 2008  
Blogger Allison said...

I love reading travel books!

I tend to read instructions/manuals for such things as putting furniture together, but hardly ever for technology. Too stubborn for that, I guess.

Thursday, 15 May, 2008  
Blogger Melody said...

Ah...travel books! I haven't thought of that. I'll read them before going on a trip, but then I still find internet is the best source of everything.

Thursday, 15 May, 2008  
Blogger Barbara Bruederlin said...

I read the manuals if I get stumped but generally try to wing it first.

Never how-to or self-help books. Love certain travel books by specific writers howver.

Thursday, 15 May, 2008  
Blogger GeraniumCat said...

The trouble with travel guides is that they leave out vital information, like what colour a mail-box is in country X, or that the tram has a little machine you feed your ticket into - I'm making it up, but, especially when travelling alone, you can find yourself staring around helplessly, unable to find what you are looking for. Not, if they gave instructions, that I would read them.

Friday, 16 May, 2008  
Blogger John's comments said...

Now when John Wayne rode in to town to tackle the cattle barons in their fancy Eastern Style ranches you never see anyone struggling with a flat pack manual. Yet mail order catalogues took off in the 19th century so did the fancy furniture arrive all made up? We need an answer!!

Friday, 16 May, 2008  
Blogger John Mutford said...

Booksplease: Sometimes there are indeed spare parts. Though I wish they'd all tell us when they have thrown in a few extras, just to spare us the stress.

Chris: If my travel guide feels the need to instruct me on how not to kidnapped, I think I'll skip the vacation ;)

Melanie: I've probably given the impression that I've done a lot of traveling. I have, but only in Canada. Outside of that I've only been to Jamaica, California, and Hawaii.

Jen: The programming manuals crack me up when libraries try to pawn them off at used book sales. Does anyone really need a WordPerfect 5.0 Dummies Guide?

Gautami: There are travel guides, then there's travel writing. I appreciate both, but would like to read more of the latter.

Megan: I know they work for a lot of people and I'm cool with that.

Allison: I'd love to find a practical book that would make interesting reading. An entertaining book on car maintenance would be nice. Unless it's Zen and The Art of Car Repair *shudder*

Melody: The internet is the best source, for sure.

Barbara: Do you remember the Simpsons quote that (roughly) goes, "'Tis a fine barn, but tis no pool English." That'd be me if I winged it.

Geranium Cat: Of course no travel book could be complete, but still neat to have some idea of the sights and attractions that I'd like to see (or avoid).

John's Comments: Ikea still hadn't caught on, I guess.

Friday, 16 May, 2008  

Wednesday, May 14, 2008

The Great Wednesday Compare 2: Charlotte Brontë VERSUS Margaret Laurence

The winner of last week's Great Wednesday Compare (Charlotte Brontë Vs. Emily Brontë Vs. Anne Brontë), was Charlotte Brontë with 9 votes. Anne brought in 6, Emily had none.

If I surprised anyone with a three way contest, I was surprised in return with the results-- not so much that Charlotte won, but that the race ended up between her and Anne. Emily had 0 votes! Until doing this match, I hadn't even heard of Agnes Grey or the Tenant of Wildfell Hall. But who hasn't heard of Wuthering Heights? Though judging by some of the comments from last week, hearing of a book doesn't necessarily mean it's good. Though, as I said last week, I haven't read any of these authors. Now I'm as confused as ever as to which one to start with.

I suspect this week will divide voters between Canadian or other. Admittedly, it's a bit of a survey on my part to see who's heard of this week's contender outside of the Canadian border.

Remember, vote simply by adding your comment below, base it on whatever merit you choose, voting does not end until Tuesday at 11:59 p.m. (May 20, 2008), and please spread the word!

Who's better?

Labels: , ,

Anonymous August said...

I'm going to go with Margaret Laurence. She's the grand old Dame of Canadian letters, and doesn't get near the attention she deserves, especially since Iron Maggie became CanLit's undeserving monarch.

Wednesday, 14 May, 2008  
OpenID thatsthebook said...

I have to go with Margaret Laurence. Her story, A Bird in the House has stuck with me since the first time I read it.

Wednesday, 14 May, 2008  
Blogger Nicola said...

Margaret Laurence!

Wednesday, 14 May, 2008  
Blogger zetor said...

Well I'll have to go with Charlotte again. I don't know Margaret Laurence, although I've checked her out in Wikopaedia and I think her work will be worth a look.

Wednesday, 14 May, 2008  
Blogger Melanie said...

I love Charlotte Bronte, but I'm going to go with Margaret Laurence this week. The Stone Angel is one of my favourite reads.

Wednesday, 14 May, 2008  
Blogger Remi said...

The Stone Angel was a book I loathed in high school but came to respect later.

The Diviners knocks my socks off every time I pick it up.

Almost as good is a book of letters I have between her and Al Purdy.

Laurence for sure.

Wednesday, 14 May, 2008  
Anonymous pooker said...

No question in my mind, Margaret Laurence.

I first "met" Margaret Laurence, Margaret Atwood and Alice Munro in my barely adulthood. Since then I suspect I've read every novel and short story each of them has published. The three of them turned me on to Canadian fiction like no other author. Laurence's short story, "The Loons" and The Diviners are among my favourite pieces of fiction. Ask me to choose from Laurence, Atwood and Munro and I don't think I could. But as between Charlotte Bronte and Margaret Laurence, well, I like Charlotte but she's a passing acquaintance. Margaret Laurence is one of my best friends.

Come on, look at that picture! Can't you see her sitting at your own table?

Wednesday, 14 May, 2008  
Anonymous Imani said...

Oh this is a cruel match up. The Stone Angel and Jane Eyre are two of my top ten of all time books. Sadly, Bronte must lose out since I just read "Villette" which was technically brilliant but preachy, preachy, preachy and about an entirely wrong message too.:D I've read more books by Laurence that I love or admire.

*clutches heart* So...it's Laurence.

Wednesday, 14 May, 2008  
Anonymous Carrie K said...

I'd never heard of Margaret Laurence. I've got to read one of her books.

So, in default, Charlotte Bronte.

Wednesday, 14 May, 2008  
Blogger raidergirl3 said...

Oh my, I feel like such a bad Canadian reader. I havent' read any Laurence, but the first 7 commenters are making me feel like I am missing out on something huge. I've only recently read Jane Eyre, so I dont' claim any of the dramatic love for Bronte. I guess I will have to abstain. I dont' feel qualified to vote.

Wednesday, 14 May, 2008  
Anonymous snackywombat said...

if i had voted last week, i would have voted for emily! but i'm going to have to vote for charlotte here because i re-read jane eyre last year and it truly is an involving and hair-raising tale.

Wednesday, 14 May, 2008  
Blogger Bybee said...

Can I shake your hand for having great match-ups?

I want to read more of Margaret Laurence, but this week, I have to go with Charlotte Bronte because of Jane Eyre...I never knew before this novel (I was 9 or 10) that it was possible to have a visceral reaction to literature. I thank her for that.

Thursday, 15 May, 2008  
Blogger